madmax Posted August 18, 2020 Report Share Posted August 18, 2020 Hello, I believe there is a bug in sc_name_gen.cpp, function sc_name_gen::gen_unique_name. It's possible that one sc_name_gen instance generates the same name twice in cases where the "preserve_first" flag is set to true, and the basename already contains a "_N" postfix. Example: sc_gen_unique_name("bla", true); // -> "bla" sc_gen_unique_name("bla", true); // -> "bla_1" sc_gen_unique_name("bla_1", true); // -> "bla_1" The bug should be present on all versions. I also noticed that the "preserve_first" functionality is not mentioned in the standard at all. Thanks and Regards, Max Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.