Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by madmax

  1. Hello, I believe there is a bug in sc_name_gen.cpp, function sc_name_gen::gen_unique_name. It's possible that one sc_name_gen instance generates the same name twice in cases where the "preserve_first" flag is set to true, and the basename already contains a "_N" postfix. Example: sc_gen_unique_name("bla", true); // -> "bla" sc_gen_unique_name("bla", true); // -> "bla_1" sc_gen_unique_name("bla_1", true); // -> "bla_1" The bug should be present on all versions. I also noticed that the "preserve_first" functionality is not mentioned in the standard at all. Thanks and Regards, Max
  • Create New...