c4brian Posted November 5, 2015 Report Share Posted November 5, 2015 A coworker and I were discussing this question... In order to run a regression suite, or multiple regression suites, etc, would you... run a test, stop the simulator, log any results (pass/fail), etc, then start the simulator again on a new test with a new random seed OR... Run a single test, which runs several high level sequences, one after the other? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uwes Posted November 6, 2015 Report Share Posted November 6, 2015 hi, i would go for short tests each with a new seed instead of a single test with alot of sequences. reason is that i can distribute the short tests easier in the computing farm and if a test fails the turnaround is fast. (a long test failing in the end is hard to debug) /uwe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tudor.timi Posted November 6, 2015 Report Share Posted November 6, 2015 I've already commited my thoughts on the topic to the Interwebs: http://blog.verificationgentleman.com/2015/03/why-i-favor-short-tests.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.