McPall Posted December 18, 2013 Report Share Posted December 18, 2013 `uvm_do_with(m_top_seq, {m_sub_seq.num_of_trans == 0;}) The above example results in a runtime null object failure for m_sub_seq Is there a way to overcome this without copying all m_sub_seq random variables to m_top_seq ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uwes Posted January 14, 2014 Report Share Posted January 14, 2014 hi, I assume that m_sub_seq is a child of m_top_seq. if so the constructor of m_top_seq should allocate .m_sub_seq as well (or allocate it in pre_randomize()). this is because sv doesnt allocate objects during randomization in contrast to sn/e. /uwe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.