[uvm-1.1b] src/reg/uvm_reg_field.svh line 1505, seems missing ";"

[SeanChou]

I was told there is a missing ";" in src/reg/uvm_reg_field.svh line 1505 today. please be aware and thanks!

`ifdef UVM_REG_NO_INDIVIDUAL_FIELD_ACCESS
   rw.element_kind = UVM_REG;
   rw.element = m_parent;
   rw.value = value_adjust;
   m_parent.do_write(rw) // line 1505, missing ";" here.
`else

[SeanChou]

Another problem

line1504 should be:

// rw.value = value_adjust ;

rw.value[0] = value_adjust ;

rw.value is a dynamic array there. same problem in 1614.

[SeanChou]

The reason why this user define UVM_REG_NO_INDIVIDUAL_FIELD_ACCESS is he want to filter the following warning.

if (!m_individually_accessible) begin

`uvm_warning("RegModel",

{"Individual field access not available for field '",

get_full_name(), "'. Accessing complete register instead."})

return 0;

end

However, is that normal to have a lot of wanring in this kind in log?

do you suggest to filter it by uvm_report_catcher in default?

[janick]

The first issue has already been reported: http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=4158

The second has already been fixed in the latest release.

The catcher would be a better solution than disabling field-access for those field that are individually accessible.