ecarstens Posted July 9, 2012 Report Share Posted July 9, 2012 I commented out the "local" keyword preceding uvm_in_order_class_comparator in the uvm_algorithmic_comparator in order to have public access to the match and mismatch variables inside that comparator, so that at the end of simulation I was able to log how many mismatches there were. Has anybody else encountered this issue? There is a port that could be used to monitor the pairs, but that seemed more complicated then just gaining access to these variables that already exist. Unless there is a reason to make it local, I would suggest this be changed in the UVM distribution. By the way, I am new to UVM and this forum, so I apologize if this has already been covered or there is something easy I'm missing. -Ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petermonsson Posted July 20, 2012 Report Share Posted July 20, 2012 I've added your suggestion to the UVM Issue tracker. You can see the status here: http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=4258 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.