ecarstens Posted July 9, 2012 Report Posted July 9, 2012 I commented out the "local" keyword preceding uvm_in_order_class_comparator in the uvm_algorithmic_comparator in order to have public access to the match and mismatch variables inside that comparator, so that at the end of simulation I was able to log how many mismatches there were. Has anybody else encountered this issue? There is a port that could be used to monitor the pairs, but that seemed more complicated then just gaining access to these variables that already exist. Unless there is a reason to make it local, I would suggest this be changed in the UVM distribution. By the way, I am new to UVM and this forum, so I apologize if this has already been covered or there is something easy I'm missing. -Ed Quote
petermonsson Posted July 20, 2012 Report Posted July 20, 2012 I've added your suggestion to the UVM Issue tracker. You can see the status here: http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=4258 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.