Jump to content

Uvm_reg::do_predict() in UVM (1800.2-2020-1.0) does not skip prediction if the status field is set to UVM_NOT_OK


Recommended Posts

The uvm_reg::do_predict() method contains an if clause which is true when the status field of the register is set to UVM_IS_OK. However it seems the begin end statements are unintentionally missed which causes the prediction to be done also when the status is UVM_NOT_OK. I would expect prediction to be skipped and it seems from the indentation that this was also intended by the implementer. 

Another issue related to the incorrect processing of the status field (UVM_NO_OK) in uvm_reg_predictor::write() has been open for quite some time at:

0005449: uvm_reg_predictor ignores status of bus_op - Accellera Mantis (mantishub.io)

Would it be possible for someone from the UVM working group to provide an estimate as to when these issues can be resolved. Thanks

do_predict.JPG

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...