Jump to content

Difference between Master and Slave Agents

Recommended Posts

Can anyone please explain what is the difference between Master agent and slave agent? I have tried searching through many blogs and guides, but could not come to a final conclusion.

In my Testbench architecture, I am verifying a SECDED Hamming code Encoder-decoder. These are the steps

1. Agent 0 drives Data_in and valid to Encoder.

2. Agent 1 monitor receives encoded data with parity and passes it to Agent 2 (re-active agent)

3. Agent 2 generates error injection and drives the error-injected data with parity to decoder.

4. Agent 3 captures the type of error (single/double) from Decoder.

5. Agent 4 monitor captures the decoded data and passes it to scoreboard.


I am confused here, which agents are masters and which are slaves. 


uvm (2).JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, in UVM people tend to talk about agents as being passive, active, or reactive instead of "master" or "slave".

Each agent contains a driver, a monitor, and a sequencer.

An active agent has all three.

A passive agent monitors, but does not drive.

A reactive agent drives, but depends on the DUT more closely (i.e. the agent drives data to the DUT, but reacts in some way with the DUT.

So I guess you could be using "master" to mean active, and "slave" to mean reactive *or* passive.



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...