doituvm Posted September 5, 2011 Report Share Posted September 5, 2011 Hello, We are a small start-up using UVM with IUS. We use UVM-Reg and all the good old OVM stuff in UVM. One of the things that our lead strongly believes is that the new task-based phasing (a la VMM_env) is a must to use. But given the slew of changes, conf-calls going on in UVM development @Accellera we are nervous about the same. Any real user experience - should we attempt to use the new, task based UVM phases right away? Or should we stick to OVM-like run() alone being task and handle synchronizations painfully? Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.