Robert.g.Liu Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 Hi, Any idea that in the uvm_object::copy implementation the do_copy is prior to the __m_uvm_field_automation while in the others, like print, compare, pack and unpack the do_* function calls are following the __m_uvm_field_automation calls? In my opinion putting the do_* after the __m_uvm_field_automation is better than the reversed order of the placement since it gives the derivation of uvm_object all the rights to deal with any kind of exceptions. It also keeps the consistency between the field automation method and do_* methods. Thanks, Robert Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.