Jump to content

Comments on style

Recommended Posts

Comments from a colleague on the style of the document contents

  • The naming styles of the examples are divergent
    • clk vs. ck
    • Figure9 ff.: out1 vs. gout2
    • Figure10: the last FF output has no name
  • At several places, the active form (e.g., “we have included pseudo code”) has been used instead of the more formal passive form (“pseudo code has been included”) which is common for standards
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...