John Jebakumar Posted November 2 Report Share Posted November 2 Comments from a colleague on the style of the document contents The naming styles of the examples are divergent clk vs. ck Figure9 ff.: out1 vs. gout2 Figure10: the last FF output has no name At several places, the active form (e.g., “we have included pseudo code”) has been used instead of the more formal passive form (“pseudo code has been included”) which is common for standards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Jebakumar Posted November 3 Author Report Share Posted November 3 CDC_Standard_Version_0.1_Feedback_Janson.zip Inputs from another colleague annotated in the PDF directly as comments and notes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.