John Jebakumar

CDC_Standard_Version_0.1_Feedback_Janson.zip Inputs from another colleague annotated in the PDF directly as comments and notes.

Comments from a colleague on the style of the document contents The naming styles of the examples are divergent clk vs. ck Figure9 ff.: out1 vs. gout2 Figure10: the last FF output has no name At several places, the active form (e.g., “we have included pseudo code”) has been used instead of the more formal passive form (“pseudo code has been included”) which is common for standards