Jump to content

functional coverage

Recommended Posts

I understand the UVM-SystemC WG has plans to add functional coverage capabilities to the library.


I'm curious if they plan to start with any existing C++ or SystemC libraries as a foundation.


If I wanted to write functional coverage goals in SystemC today, is there an existing library I could use today that would result in minimal porting effort to a future Accellera standard?


Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are some commercial and proprietary functional coverage approaches in C++/SystemC, but these are not contributed for standardization.


Therefore the WG will work on a new and open standard proposal, along the lines of the initial ideas as presented at NASCUG at DAC2014 (slide 30, 31):



Of course this is subject to change. For example, the prefixes will change, as well as some methods and arguments, since we aim for integration in UVM-SystemC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...