ecco Posted June 20, 2013 Report Posted June 20, 2013 I'll give a brief example of what I intend to to: template <int N> SC_MODULE(request_scheduler_m) { subblock subblock[N]; void proc(); SC_CTOR(request_scheduler_m) { unsigned int i; for (i = 0; i < N; i++) { round_robin[N]("subblock instance"); } (...) Basically, N subblocks must be instantiated inside request_scheduler and N is a template parameter. The compiler is complaining about the code above. Is it possible to do that? Quote
apfitch Posted June 20, 2013 Report Posted June 20, 2013 The compiler is complaining because you can't supply a constructor argument to an element of an array. Either replace your array of subblocks with an array of pointers to sub-blocks, or, even better, use sc_vector (see 1666-2011). kind regards Alan maehne 1 Quote
ecco Posted June 21, 2013 Author Report Posted June 21, 2013 Thanks for the answer, using the sc_vector did the trick But how can I use vectors when submodules require extra arguments in the constructor? They tried to cover it in 1666-2011, but they wouldn't be able to write a worst explanation even if they would have put a lot of effort on it. Really tough to understand with incomplete examples. Quote
apfitch Posted June 21, 2013 Report Posted June 21, 2013 (edited) I think I can safely say the LRM is not intended to be a tutorial :-) Philipp Hartmann wrote a paper https://complex.offis.de/documents/doc_download/29-scvector-container-and-the-ieee-p1666-2011-systemc-standard and he also wrote the original code. I'm sure Philipp will pop up if you have any further questions, kind regards Alan P.S. I couldn't get the download link to work - but if you click View, you can then download it from the viewer. Edited June 21, 2013 by apfitch Quote
Philipp A Hartmann Posted June 22, 2013 Report Posted June 22, 2013 (edited) Thanks for letting me know, that the download link is somewhat broken. I tried to fix it and it seems to be working here now. The link to the details page is https://complex.offis.de/documents/doc_details/29. In this presentation, several examples for "custom creator functions" are given. Personally, I prefer the variant of using sc_bind in combination with a local member function: // creator function (member function of surrounding block) subblock* request_scheduler_m::create_subblock( const char* nm, size_t idx ) { // call constructor with other parameters subblock* sub_p = new subblock(nm, param_1, param_2); return sub_p; } // initialize vector with custom creator subblock_vec.init( N, sc_bind( &request_scheduler_m::create_subblock, this, sc_unnamed::_1, sc_unnamed::_2 ) ); Using this variant of a creator, you can easily "store" and/or prepare the values of the module parameters within member variables of the surrounding module. Greetings from Oldenburg, Philipp Edited June 22, 2013 by Philipp A. Hartmann maehne 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.