jeiler Posted February 13, 2013 Report Posted February 13, 2013 Is there a reason that none of the classes for uvm_reg/uvm_mem stuff implement a create function? A bunch of them extend uvm_object, so I think they should define a basic create function that returns a new object as opposed to falling through to the uvm_object::create function that just returns null. Quote
jadec Posted February 13, 2013 Report Posted February 13, 2013 These base classes are not intended to be directly instantiated. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.