Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
mramdas

Are there any recommendations/guidelines on using UVM run sub phases?

Recommended Posts

The cook book from Mentor tells following and in another thread, the moderator also suggested against using the sub phases of run.

However in one of my projects, I do find the need for using them (and infact we had an internal implemention of something similar in our previous OVM version). 
Are there any thing happening on this front? Is there a risk in using the sub phases if some of that changes in a future version?

 

"The Accellera UVM committee is still developing the use models and APIs for new UVM phasing as it relates to sequences and transactors. In the mean time, our recommendation is to wait until that work is done and the API is stable. There are a number of future articles in this section which will be available here at that time, and which will describe our recommendations for using this technology. These include:

How to make your testbench phase aware [Not yet available]
How to manage sequences in the context of phasing [Not yet available]
How to design reusable transactors that work in the context of phasing [Not yet available] "

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...