Jump to content

Recommended Posts

`uvm_do_with(m_top_seq, {m_sub_seq.num_of_trans == 0;})

The above example results in a runtime null object failure for m_sub_seq

Is there a way to overcome this without copying all m_sub_seq random variables to m_top_seq ?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites



I assume that m_sub_seq is a child of m_top_seq. if so the constructor of m_top_seq should allocate .m_sub_seq as well (or allocate it in pre_randomize()). this is because sv doesnt allocate objects during randomization in contrast to sn/e.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...