Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'tlm 2.0'.
Found 7 results
-
Is there a way to identify each generic payload transactions with id? I need some id that I can print out as my transaction flows from initiator to target via different modules. Thanks -
Hello , I am having a closed design which is running using SystemC 2.3.1 , When i updagraded to version 2.3.2 i found an error resulting from multi_socket_bases.h in the b_transport method "Call to b_transport without a registered callback for b_transport" as shown below. multi_socket_bases.h void b_transport(transaction_type& trans,sc_core::sc_time& t){ //check if a callback is registered if (m_b_f && m_b_f->is_valid()) { (*m_b_f)(m_id, trans,t); //do the callback return; } display_error("Call to b_transport wit -
Hello, I'm just starting off with TLM-2.0 and would like to explore more about the use cases for byte_enable_ptr. In TLM manual, I see that " A value of 0 shall indicate that that corresponding byte is disabled, and a value of 0xff shall indicate that the corresponding byte is enabled"; Does this mean that we can switch between 0xff and 0x0 if required for every transaction? TLM manual also states that Byte Enable can be used to create burst transfers, can anyone please explain this? Thanks, R.Adiga
-
I couldn't find a fifo that I can attached to socket. Are there any fifo available or do we have to create our own fifo? Thanks
-
Hello All, I am trying to create a generic TLM interface for 2 to 3 modules . In which i am virtually inherting the tlm interface . But i am getting an error . Could you tell me the cause of error. example class A : public sc_module, public my_tlm_interface_fw{ }; class B : public sc_module, public my_tlm_interface_forward , public my_tlm_interface_backward{ } class C : public sc_module, public my_tlm_interface_backward{ } and binding C->initiator(B->target) B->initiator(A->target) Error: (E124) sc_export instance not bound to interface at end of c
-
Hello all, i am using tlm socket and declared as following tlm_utils::simple_initiator_socket_tagged<current_model> initiator_socket[2]; // in construcot initiator_socket[0] = new tlm_utils::simple_initiator_socket_tagged<current_model>("socket0"); initiator_socket[1] = new tlm_utils::simple_initiator_socket_tagged<current_model>("socket1"); error: no match for ‘operator=’ (operand types are ‘tlm_utils::simple_initiator_socket_tagged<current_model<unsigned int, 32u>, 32u, tlm::tlm_base_protocol_types>’ and ‘tlm_utils::si
-
Hi everybody! About my model: Here is two different initiators and one target. Initiators makes b_transport to different sockets. first b_transport of each initiator its "req to transition", second - data transition. Could anybody help me to write synch point? My target should will call some behavioral function when all initiators will make "req to transition". Could anybody helps me to change this code? Please, help me! #define SC_INCLUDE_DYNAMIC_PROCESSES #include <systemc.h> #include <tlm.h> #include <tlm_utils\simple_initiator_socket.h> #include <tlm_utils\simple_
