Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'sensitivity'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Accellera Systems Initiative
    • Information
    • Announcements
    • In the News
  • SystemC
    • SystemC Language
    • SystemC AMS (Analog/Mixed-Signal)
    • SystemC TLM (Transaction-level Modeling)
    • SystemC Verification (UVM-SystemC, SCV)
    • SystemC CCI (Configuration, Control & Inspection)
    • SystemC Datatypes
  • UVM (Universal Verification Methodology)
    • UVM 2017 - Methodology and BCL Forum
    • UVM SystemVerilog Discussions
    • UVM Simulator Specific Issues
    • UVM Commercial Announcements
    • UVM (Pre-IEEE) Methodology and BCL Forum
    • UVM 1.2 Public Review
  • Portable Stimulus
    • Portable Stimulus 1.0
    • Portable Stimulus Pre-Release Discussion
  • IP Security
    • IP Security Assurance Whitepaper Discussion
  • IP-XACT
    • IP-XACT Discussion
  • IEEE 1735/IP Encryption
    • IEEE 1735/IP Encryption Discussion
  • Commercial Announcements
    • Announcements

Categories

  • SystemC
  • UVM
  • UCIS
  • IEEE 1735/IP Encryption

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests


Biography


Location


Interests


Occupation


Company

Found 2 results

  1. Hello, When using a multiport port type as follows: struct M:sc_module{ sc_port<sc_signal_in_if<sc_dt::sc_logic>, 32, SC_ZERO_OR_MORE_BOUND> prt_input; void end_of_eleaboration(){ SC_METHOD(action); for(int i=0;i<prt_input.size();i++) sensitive << prt_input->value_changed_event(); } ... }; Is there any way to capture the port index "i" which changed the value and caused the method to be called? Thanks,
  2. Greetings everyone, I have a process that is sensitive to an sc_vector (specifically a vector of input ports) and was curious about how to handle the fact that values are maintained on each port in that vector on subsequent iterations of the process. This makes it very difficult to determine which values are actually new when the process is executed. I was hoping there would be a way to clear the value on a port once it had been read, but I could not find anything like this. The closest thing to a solution is to "latch" the value each time the process gets triggered and then compare the
×
×
  • Create New...