Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'Register verification'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Accellera Systems Initiative
    • Information
    • Announcements
    • In the News
  • SystemC
    • SystemC Language
    • SystemC AMS (Analog/Mixed-Signal)
    • SystemC TLM (Transaction-level Modeling)
    • SystemC Verification (UVM-SystemC, SCV, CRAVE, FC4SC)
    • SystemC CCI (Configuration, Control & Inspection)
    • SystemC Datatypes
  • UVM (Universal Verification Methodology)
    • UVM (IEEE 1800.2) - Methodology and BCL Forum
    • UVM SystemVerilog Discussions
    • UVM Simulator Specific Issues
    • UVM Commercial Announcements
    • UVM (Pre-IEEE) Methodology and BCL Forum
  • Portable Stimulus
    • Portable Stimulus Discussion
    • Portable Stimulus 2.0 Public Review Feedback
  • IP Security
    • SA-EDI Standard Discussion
    • IP Security Assurance Whitepaper Discussion
  • IP-XACT
    • IP-XACT Discussion
  • SystemRDL
    • SystemRDL Discussion
  • IEEE 1735/IP Encryption
    • IEEE 1735/IP Encryption Discussion
  • Commercial Announcements
    • Announcements

Categories

  • SystemC
  • UVM
  • UCIS
  • IEEE 1735/IP Encryption

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests


Biography


Location


Interests


Occupation


Company

Found 1 result

  1. I'm experimenting UVM RAL register verification for all the access types for registers and I'm experiencing the issue while using built-in sequence uvm_reg_access_seq. In my design I've implemented all the access types of register and while using mentioned sequence, RC and RS access types register are being written and then read which I believe should not happen by UVM reference guide. In UVM reference guide, by definition RO, RS and RC access types registers behavioral is mentioned below. ”RO” W: no effect, R: no effect ”RC” W: no effect, R: clears all bits ”RS” W: no effect, R: sets all bits While RO registers being verified, following warning is given by UVM. UVM_WARNING uvm_1.1d/reg/sequences/uvm_reg_access_seq.svh(107) @ 370: reporter@@reg_access_seq.single_reg_access_seq [uvm_reg_access_seq] Register 'model.mem_model.status_reg' has RO fields But for RC and RS access types registers, I can see its trying to write via FRONTDOOR first and then reads BACKDOOR and finally there is data mismatch error is generated.
×
×
  • Create New...