Jump to content

TRANG

Members
  • Content Count

    58
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by TRANG

  1. Hi all, I got some issue when test memory check (valgrind 3.11.0). ==467== Use of uninitialised value of size 8 ==467== at 0x300B000: ??? (in /lib64/libsystemc-2.3.1.so) ==467== by 0x3000B02: sc_core::wait(…) (in /lib64/libsystemc-2.3.1.so) ==467== by 0x3000C04: sc_core::sc_module::wait(…) (sc_module.h) ==467== by 0x40B0B9A: SAZZ::EndThread() (SAZZ.cpp:813) ==467== by 0x40EB0B1: sc_core::sc_thread_cor_fn (in /lib64/libsystemc-2.3.1.so) ==467== by 0x4139044: ??? (in /lib64/libsystemc-2.3.1.so) ==467== Uninitialized value was created by a stack allocation ==467== at 0x300B000: ??? (in /lib
  2. I have a simple code as bellow: class Tmodel{ private: sc_event notify_method_2; sc_event notify_method_4; public: sc_event notify_method_3; sc_in<bool> input_port; ... SC_METHOD(method_1); dont_initialize(); sensitive << input_port; SC_METHOD(method_2); dont_initialize(); sensitive << notify_method_2; SC_METHOD(method_3); dont_initialize(); sensitive << notify_method_3; SC_METHOD(method_4); dont_initialize(); sensitive << notify_method_4; ... void method_1(void){ ... notify_method_2.notify(
  3. hi @Philipp A Hartmann I get the following message: ==25661== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 1,400 of 14,166 ==25661== at 0x402B9B4: operator new(unsigned int) (vg_replace_malloc.c:333) ==25661== by 0x40D8AB3: sc_core::sc_port_base::make_sensitive(sc_core::sc_method_process*,sc_core::sc_event_finder*) const (in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libsystemc-2.3.1.so) ==25661== by 0x40D8C41: sc_core::sc_sensitive::operator<<(sc_core::sc_port_base const&) (in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libsystemc-2.3.1.so) ==25661== Address 0x5C2BB94 is 32 bytes inside a blo
  4. In my case: I bind directly initiator and target iSocket(tSocket); when target receive transaction, it will copy data to payload unsigned char data[1024]; for (unsigned int i = 0; i < NUM_MAX; i++) { data[i] = i ; } memcpy(trans.get_data_ptr(), &data, length); with length = 128, Initiator read 128 byte from "trans", and I get 0, 1, 2, 3, 4,...127 I think if BUSWIDTH = 32 then I only get 0 ,1 ,2, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0.... It is mean, Initiator can get 128 bytes, in spite of BUSWIDTH= 32, So, I'm not clarify about BUSWIDTH
  5. Hi all, I dont know what is mean using Bus width when declare a socket. eg: model A has an initiator socket : tlm::tlm_initiator_socket<32,tlm::tlm_base_protocol_types,0> iSocket; //BUSWIDTH = 32 model B has a target socket : tlm::tlm_target_socket<32,tlm::tlm_base_protocol_types,0> tSocket; //BUSWIDTH = 32 iSocket will bind with tSocket. when I issue a transaction from model A to model B with trans.set_data_length(128); // 128 > BUSWIDTH I received 128 byte data, What is mean BUSWIDTH when I declare a socket?
  6. Hi all, I have 2 models, model A and model B Model A has an output port out_A (bool) Model B has an input port in_B (bool) when integrate, I will instance 3 objects of Model A, 1 object of Model B //file @connection.cpp ... void initializeENV(){ ... objA_1 = new ModelA("objA_1"); objA_2 = new ModelA("objA_2"); objA_3 = new ModelA("objA_3"); objB = new ModelB("objB"); ... } the value of in_B = objA_1->out_A or objA_2->out_A or objA_3->out_A I think that, if I bind as below . It is wrong. Because of when objA_1->out_A is change then affect to obj_2-&g
  7. Master and Slave use same clock, so I think Slave need only care data_in. class slave : public sc_module { public: sc_in<bool> clk; sc_in<uint32_t> data_in; slave(sc_module_name name):clk("clk"),data_in("data_in"){ SC_HAS_PROCESS(slave); SC_METHOD(run); dont_initialize(); sensitive << data_in; } void run(){ cout<<hex<<data_in.read()<<endl; } ~slave(){ } }; or class slave : public sc_module { public: sc_in<bool> clk; sc_in<uint32_t> data_in; slave
  8. Thank for your support,
  9. I'm sorry make you confused. Summary: if my test case is: sc_start(2*period,time_unit); while (sc_pending_activity_at_current_time()) { sc_start(SC_ZERO_TIME); } or sc_start(3*period,time_unit); then compare match occur.( is correct) If my test case is: sc_start(2*period,time_unit); then compare match don't occur . I want to my source code detect when time simulate near the over to pending to execute event m_update before over.
  10. i try : void GTimer::end_of_simulation() { while (sc_pending_activity_at_current_time()) { sc_start(SC_ZERO_TIME); } } But It is not true? My problem is the time simulates is over before trigger event. I want to force trigger event before end simulate.
  11. Thanks @Philipp A Hartmann it is OK if I use : sc_start(2*period,time_unit); while( sc_pending_activity_at_current_time() ) sc_start( SC_ZERO_TIME ); But I want to pending in my code. Is it possible?
  12. Thank @Eyck I understand that. Do you have any idea for this problem? How to resolve? Thanks very much.
  13. Hi all, I'm using systemC to build timer model. ( Timer support compares match, overflow, underflow) //constructor SC_METHOD(evaluate_method); dont_initialize(); sensitive << m_evaluate; SC_METHOD(update_method); dont_initialize(); sensitive << m_update; void GTimer::evaluate_method() { //check if compare match if(CNT_value == compare_match_value){ compare_match_handling(); } ... m_update.notify((double)period * compare_match_value, time_unit); } void GTimer::update_method() { CNT_value = get_counter_value();
  14. Hi @CapUnderPantsRLZ in 1666-2011.pdf So, I think @David Black is exactly. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45308468/systemc-multiple-module-implementations-in-single-cpp-file
  15. Thank you so much, @David Black
  16. Hi all, I try code bellow SC_METHOD(APMMethod); sensitive << mAPMEvent; ... void APMMethod(){ printf("Reset port\n"); ... } ... void Initialize() { for(unsigned int i=0; i< 50; i++){ mAPM_reg[i].value = 0; printf("Initialize %s\n",mAPM_reg[i].name); } } ... void EnableReset(){ //reset port mAPMEvent.notify(SC_ZERO_TIME); //initialize reg Initialize(); } When EnableReset occur. My output is: Intialize APM_REG1 Intialize APM_REG2 ... Reset port I try with mAPMEvent.notify(); But the same output. 1. why Ini
  17. I can't see that because my lib is 2.3.1. So, with 2.3.1, we don't have a solution. Thank Philipp.
  18. Hi @David Black, If I have sc_event event1; sc_event event2; ... SC_METHOD( My_method ); sensitive << event1 << event2; dont_initialize(); How to detect My_method sensitive by event1 or event2?
  19. Hi all, Can you explain about ideas of "Timing annotation", "Temporal decoupling", "Quantum keeper"? How do you use it?.
  20. sensitive<< rd_addr I think above code is illegal. You can declare event. If new value rd_addr != old value rd_addr then notify event .
  21. Thank @Eyck As your comment, my understand that 1. It is done in the destructor of the the tlm_generic_payload ( both AT and LT style ) 2. The other option is to call free_all_extensions() after transaction completed ( only AT style ) Is it correct? Thanks.
  22. I read some source code. class TlmExtension : public tlm_extension<TlmExtension> { ... }; void setExtension(tlm::tlm_generic_payload &in, tlm::tlm_generic_payload &out) { TlmExtension *input = (TlmExtension *)0; TlmExtension *output = new TlmExtension; in.get_extension(input); if (input != NULL) { output->setNum(input->getNum()); output->setChannel(input->getChannel()); out.set_extension(output); } } I think above code is wrong. Because of when exit setExtension function. We cant delete object create
  23. Dear all, Can you explain the difference between ? sc_signal<unsigned int > port1; and sc_signal<sc_uint<32> > port2; When to use port1 and port2?
×
×
  • Create New...