Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
paragsathe

Can a instance of Interface be used in a virtual sequence?

Recommended Posts

hi,

typically you should NOT peek/poke directly from the transaction layer into the physical/bit layer. this is not a good solution for reuse and scalability.

btw: if you know and accept the downsides it might be the coding wise faster solution.

/uwe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>But suppose i need the status of a particluar signal to cal a sequence inside a virtual sequencer, is there a way other than peek/poke the interface signals.

Yes, the interface signals can be abstracted away. The status needed can be given a name, and providing that named status can be put as a requirement on the top level environment, i.e. simply assert that a testbench for my_dut shall provide status this and status that. When the test, in turn, is implemented by means of the testbench, it can just ask the testbench for status between sequences as needed, without direct reference to interface signals. Virtual sequences too can be implemented by means of the testbench, and can get hold of status in the same way a test would do. In this way, the testbench can use whatever method it likes to obtain the status, e.g. receive it through a port or event, or forward the status request to a component in the interface. The test or virtual sequence wouldn't notice the difference.

Erling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×