Khushi Posted July 17, 2018 Report Share Posted July 17, 2018 Hello Guys I have a scenario where I have an initiator module on SystemC side and target module on UVL side. From initiator side, I call b_transport with some payload and in target side the data field is modified. What I am seeing that when b_transport returns on initiator module, the changes in data field is not reflected. On SystemC side, I have a thread with following function void run(){ int i = 4; while(i--){ cout<<" in run........"<<endl; tlm::tlm_generic_payload* trans = new tlm::tlm_generic_payload; sc_time delay = sc_time(100, SC_NS); trans->set_command(tlm::TLM_WRITE_COMMAND); uint64_t addr = 0x0; uint8_t data = 0xa5; uint32_t length = 1; trans->set_address(addr); trans->set_data_ptr( reinterpret_cast<unsigned char*>(&data)); trans->set_data_length(length); trans->set_streaming_width(length); trans->set_response_status(tlm::TLM_INCOMPLETE_RESPONSE); initiator_socket->b_transport(*trans,delay); cout<<"Result : 0xa5 vs 0x"<<hex<<+data<<endl; wait(delay); } } On UVM target side, my b_transport implementation is as follows task b_transport(uvm_tlm_generic_payload gp, uvm_tlm_time delay); byte unsigned data[]; gp.get_data(data); `uvm_info("INFO", $sformatf("entering b_transport with data[0] : 0x%x",gp.m_data[0]), UVM_LOW); data[0] = ~data[0]; gp.set_data(data); `uvm_info("INFO", $sformatf("exiting b_transport with data[0] : 0x%x",gp.m_data[0]), UVM_LOW); endtask and the output I am getting is UVM_INFO @ 0: reporter [RNTST] Running test SV:sv_top set by +UVM_TESTNAME... in run........ UVM_INFO sv_target.sv(31) @ 0: uvm_test_top.targ [INFO] entering b_transport with data[0] : 0xa5 UVM_INFO sv_target.sv(34) @ 0: uvm_test_top.targ [INFO] exiting b_transport with data[0] : 0x5a Result : 0xa5 vs 0xa5 in run........ UVM_INFO sv_target.sv(31) @ 100000: uvm_test_top.targ [INFO] entering b_transport with data[0] : 0xa5 UVM_INFO sv_target.sv(34) @ 100000: uvm_test_top.targ [INFO] exiting b_transport with data[0] : 0x5a Result : 0xa5 vs 0xa5 in run........ UVM_INFO sv_target.sv(31) @ 200000: uvm_test_top.targ [INFO] entering b_transport with data[0] : 0xa5 UVM_INFO sv_target.sv(34) @ 200000: uvm_test_top.targ [INFO] exiting b_transport with data[0] : 0x5a Result : 0xa5 vs 0xa5 in run........ UVM_INFO sv_target.sv(31) @ 300000: uvm_test_top.targ [INFO] entering b_transport with data[0] : 0xa5 UVM_INFO sv_target.sv(34) @ 300000: uvm_test_top.targ [INFO] exiting b_transport with data[0] : 0x5a Result : 0xa5 vs 0xa5 It seems that on UVM side the data field is updated well but on TLM side it is not reflected. Can you help me to understand what is going wrong here ? Thanks Khushi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.