Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I understand the UVM-SystemC WG has plans to add functional coverage capabilities to the library.


I'm curious if they plan to start with any existing C++ or SystemC libraries as a foundation.


If I wanted to write functional coverage goals in SystemC today, is there an existing library I could use today that would result in minimal porting effort to a future Accellera standard?


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are some commercial and proprietary functional coverage approaches in C++/SystemC, but these are not contributed for standardization.


Therefore the WG will work on a new and open standard proposal, along the lines of the initial ideas as presented at NASCUG at DAC2014 (slide 30, 31):



Of course this is subject to change. For example, the prefixes will change, as well as some methods and arguments, since we aim for integration in UVM-SystemC.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now