Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'ipxact:design'.
Found 1 result
Is it valid to describe a design whose lower level are not all ip-xact components using ipxact:design?
Justin Huang posted a topic in IP-XACT DiscussionHi, Suppose we have an IP, e.g., IP_A, which instantiates a few sub-IPs, e.g., SUB_IP_X/Y/Z (which have ipxact component xml), and a few sub-modules which are not packaged in IP-XACT component XML. I'd like to track all the sub-IPs used by IP_A, but am not sure if ipxact:design is the right choice to describe the design hierarchy as the sub-level of IP_A includes both sub-IPs described using IP-XACT and sub-units that are not packaged using IP-XACT. Thanks, Justin