Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'coverage gcov verification'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Accellera Systems Initiative
    • Information
    • Announcements
    • In the News
  • SystemC
    • SystemC Language
    • SystemC AMS (Analog/Mixed-Signal)
    • SystemC TLM (Transaction-level Modeling)
    • SystemC Verification (UVM-SystemC, SCV)
    • SystemC CCI (Configuration, Control & Inspection)
    • SystemC Datatypes
  • UVM (Universal Verification Methodology)
    • UVM 2017 - Methodology and BCL Forum
    • UVM SystemVerilog Discussions
    • UVM Simulator Specific Issues
    • UVM Commercial Announcements
    • UVM (Pre-IEEE) Methodology and BCL Forum
    • UVM 1.2 Public Review
  • Portable Stimulus
    • Portable Stimulus Pre-Release Discussion
    • Portable Stimulus 1.0
  • IP Security
    • IP Security Assurance Whitepaper Discussion
  • IP-XACT
    • IP-XACT Discussion
  • IEEE 1735/IP Encryption
    • IEEE 1735/IP Encryption Discussion
  • OCP (Open Core Protocol)
  • UCIS (Unified Coverage Interoperability Standard)
  • Commercial Announcements
    • Announcements

Categories

  • SystemC
  • UVM
  • UCIS
  • IEEE 1735/IP Encryption

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests


Biography


Location


Interests


Occupation


Company

Found 1 result

  1. hello, I trying to do coverage using gcov and can't reach 100% for line coverage, for example: #####: 32: SC_MODULE(test) { -: 33: sc_in<bool> clk; -: 34: sc_in<bool> arst_n; -: 35: -: 36: void func1 (); -: 37: void func2 (); -: 38: 18: 39: SC_CTOR(test) { 18: 40: SC_CTHREAD(func1, clk.pos()) 18: 41: async_reset_signal_is(arst_n, false); -: 42: 18: 43: SC_CTHREAD(func2, clk.pos()); 18: 44: async_reset_signal_is(arst_n, false); -: 45: -: 46: } // end of SC_CTOR -: 47: }; // end of SC_MODULE From other project, I have another behavior (just put a stub from module), here above: 18: 32: SC_MODULE(test2) { -: 33: sc_in<bool> clk; -: 34: sc_in<bool> arst_n; -: 35: 18: 36: void func1 (); 18: 37: void func2 (); -: 38: 18: 39: SC_CTOR(test2) { 18: 40: SC_CTHREAD(func1, clk.pos()) 18: 41: async_reset_signal_is(arst_n, false); -: 42: 18: 43: SC_CTHREAD(func2, clk.pos()); 18: 44: async_reset_signal_is(arst_n, false); -: 45: -: 46: } // end of SC_CTOR -: 47: }; // end of SC_MODULE I don't understand why SC_MODULE wasn't covered from the first example, but SC_CTOR was. Can anyone tell me why this happen or could suggest another tool for coverage?
×
×
  • Create New...