Jump to content

krb

Members
  • Content Count

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

krb last won the day on October 7 2016

krb had the most liked content!

About krb

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. krb

    VCS MX and UVM

    Thanks for the prompt reply and helpful suggestion. A small correction for your suggestion, in case anyone looks at this thread for help. The second vlogan should include the uvm src path: vlogan -full64 -work work -sverilog +incdir+${UVM_HOME}/env/uvm-1.1 -f ${filelist} -l compile.vcslog
  2. Hi, Trying to compile my mixed vhdl/ SV-UVM code with vcs. dut is in vhdl and uvm testbench is in SV. I am using the multi-step analyse/eloborate method and have problem here. 1) vhdlan -full64 -work work -file ${vhdl_f} -l compile.vcslog -- works fine 2) vlogan -ntb_opts uvm-1.1 -full64 -work work -sverilog -lca -f ${filelist} -l compile.vcslog reports this error: Error-[sV-LCM-PND] Package not defined my_pkg.sv, 141 my_pkg, "uvm_pkg::" Package scope resolution failed. Token 'uvm_pkg' is not a package. Originating module 'my_pkg'. Move package definition before the use of the package. 3) vcs -full64 -work work -time_resolution 1ps +vpi +vcsd +memcbk -sverilog -lca -ntb_opts uvm-1.1 +define+UVM_TR_RECORD my_tb_top -l compile.vcslog -- didn't reach here. How can I fix these issues. BTW the same code works in IUS/irun. Is there a single step analyse/elaborate method for compiling mixed hdl ? What is the -lcs option here, I copied it from one of the examples. Thanks for any help
  3. krb

    set_global_timeout

    Hi, A question along the same line, how can my test know when it is stopped due to timeout, from a previous timeout setting (either using the function or from cmdline) ? Thanks, krb
  4. Hello Good folks at Cadence, I am trying to use "+UVM_TIMEOUT=200,YES" on the command line. I am not sure this works. There is no confirmation UVM_INFO statement printed out as the "uvm_root.svh" code suggests should be doing. I am using ml_uvm and invoke my test with -uvmtest argument. Any suggestions on how to get this to work ? Also any idea on what timeunit will the timeout value be applied at ? Many thanks, karthik.
  5. I noticed that I can't use any thing other than a == with real data type in the constraints block with IUS. Is this a limitation in SV LRM ? I apologize if this is going into simulator specific details. If you think I should start a new thread in simulator specific forums, let me know.
  6. krb

    Class fields dependency

    I wasn't mentioning to the use of logic data type, but to logic in declaring class members. I also changed your "logic [7:0] my_data" to bit type because the rand modifier only works on 2-state data types (bit). You don't have to use the rand modifier, as I did in the example. The constraint block will have no meaning without the rand.
  7. krb

    Class fields dependency

    No You cannot declare variables like this at run time. NOTE: you cannot use logic to declare class members. You could use `defines to declare variables at compile time eg: `define MY_COLOR_IS_RED 1 class my_class; color_type my_color; // Only when my_color is RED, I want this class to have another field called my_data `ifdef MY_COLOR_IS_RED rand bit [7:0] my_data; `endif endclass Not sure what your intentions are here, but this may be enough for you. class my_class; color_type my_color; rand bit [7:0] my_data; constarint c_my_data_valid_only_when_color_red { ( (my_color != RED) -> (my_data == 0) ); } endclass
  8. Hi Uwe, Thanks a lot for the links, I now understand how to make best use of Natural Docs. And it seems pretty flexible and powerful at the same time. A final question, is there a way to get pdf from natural docs. I ask because, the UVM doc has a pdf that is similar to the html docs. Or do you convert the html docs to pdf ? Thanks again, krb
  9. Hi Uwes, After a bit of googling, I found that I need to add these lines to this file Config/Languages.txt. Is this it or do I need any more changes to natural docs ? Thanks, krb. Language: SystemVerilog Extensions: sv svh Line Comment: // Block Comment: /* */ Package Separator: :: Enum Values: Global Class Prototype Ender: ; Function Prototype Ender: ; Variable Prototype Ender: ; Method Prototype Ender: ; Line Extender: \
  10. Hi uwes, Thanks for the reply. Does naturaldocs has inbuild support for SV ? or do I need an additional filter script of some kind ?
  11. Hi, Sorry for a non-technical post. How is UVM base class documented ? I see the comments in UVM base class have a lot in common with the UVM reference documents. So I was wondering if doxygen or something similar was used. We would like to use something similar. Thanks, krb
  12. That's one way of doing things. I was hoping there would be a more direct way of converting real/short_real data type into an ieee 32 encoded floating point value. eg: constraint c_real { (float_in_bits_32 == convert_to_bits(3.2)); } or constraint c_real { (float_in_bits_32 >= convert_to_bits(3.2)); (float_in_bits_32 <= convert_to_bits(100.0)); } This way of constraining is more readable and direct.
  13. Hi gabi, Thanks for the advice. I found about the switch you mentioned after I posted the question, with some help from Cadence support. I can confirm that this switch works. krb
  14. Hello, I am migrating my uvm1.0ea code to uvm1.1. I use ml_uvm to communicate with sysc models. Using uvm1.0ea (and the ml_uvm that came with it) worked just fine. Now when I migrated by code to uvm1.1, I get this error: UVM_FATAL @ 55: reporter [XMAXSTRSZ] Packed ML UVM/OVM transaction size exceeded maximal stream size This is happening on the first transaction that is sent to sysc. When I disable this transfer of transaction from SV to sysc, my uvm1.1 test envinormant works as intended, i.e, all sequences finish and test finishes as I would expect. So to debug further, I started played around with the ml_uvm examples that are shipped with IES. Mainly with sv_to_sc_demo.sh and sc_to_sv_demo.sh (in uvm-1.1/uvm_lib/uvm_ml/examples/ex_e_sv_sc_tlm) I found that sc to sv (i.e sc acting as producer) has no limit on the packed data (I experimented with a bit vector upto 9000 bits). On the other hand sv to sc (sv acting a producer) errors out far below 4096 (I assume packer also packs data types). I tried searching for the string in XMAXSTRSZ in uvm-1.1 directory but no luck. Do you have any suggestions ? Thanks, krb
  15. I think the benefit of using using sequences/virtual_sequences is that they could be reused in other sequences. I am not sure if you can reuse a uvm_test (derived components). I partly see the point in your question. At the moment for my test envinorment, there is a one to one correspondence for a uvm_test to a top_level sequence.
×